The rebuttal — "Revisiting the Revisionists"

Michael Kimmelman's counter-argument in the New York Times: the covert funding was real, the paintings were promoted, and the leap from those facts to "the CIA made Abstract Expressionism famous, and that is what it is for" does not survive the archives.

⭐⭐⭐ IT IS HERE BECAUSE THE OTHER ONE IS. This app's rule is that when the strongest objection to a thing it is building is real, the objection goes in first and at full strength. A wing that printed Cockcroft and left this out would be doing the exact thing it accuses the CCF of.